Beyond the Mat: Why Must We “Come Out” as Neurodivergent?

In the not-so-distant past, individuals were compelled to undergo psychological evaluations to determine if they were homosexual — a classification once deemed a mental disorder. It wasn’t until 1973 that the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), and by 1987, all references were eliminated .

Today, a similar narrative unfolds for neurodivergent individuals. Despite advancements in understanding, many still feel pressured to disclose their neurodivergent status to access appropriate accommodations or to be taken seriously. This expectation mirrors the outdated practices once imposed on the LGBTQ+ community, where personal identity was subjected to scrutiny and validation.

The Weight of Disclosure

For neurodivergent individuals, the act of disclosure is fraught with complexity. While some may choose to share their experiences openly, others fear stigma, discrimination, or misunderstanding. Studies indicate that disclosure can lead to both positive and negative outcomes, often depending on the environment and the perceptions of those receiving the information .

This predicament is exacerbated in professional settings, where revealing one’s neurodivergent status can impact job security and career progression. The story of Dr. Anna Rebowska, an autistic psychiatrist, highlights this tension. Despite her expertise and lived experience, she faced challenges in her profession due to prevailing biases .

Historical Parallels and Persistent Stigmas

The history of lobotomies serves as a stark reminder of the medical community’s past missteps in addressing mental health. Once considered a legitimate treatment for various psychological conditions, lobotomies often resulted in severe cognitive and emotional impairments .

Similarly, the pathologization of homosexuality led to harmful practices aimed at “curing” individuals of their sexual orientation. These historical examples underscore the dangers of labeling natural human variations as disorders requiring correction.

The Illusion of Inclusivity in Wellness Spaces

Modern wellness platforms often tout inclusivity and holistic well-being. However, many inadvertently perpetuate neurotypical standards, marginalizing those who don’t conform. Features designed without considering neurodivergent needs can lead to exclusion, even when the intent is to promote mental health.

For instance, certain meditation apps may penalize users for repetitive listening patterns, interpreting them as anomalies rather than recognizing them as coping mechanisms for some neurodivergent individuals. This oversight reflects a broader issue where systems fail to accommodate diverse neurological experiences.

The Double Standard of Observation

In the serene ambiance of a yoga studio, one might expect a sanctuary of acceptance and self-discovery. Yet, for many neurodivergent individuals, these spaces can feel more like arenas of scrutiny than havens of healing.

Consider this: when a neurotypical individual enters a yoga class, their practice is often respected as a personal journey. However, when someone with a background in dance or movement — traits sometimes associated with neurodivergence — joins, their practice may be subject to unsolicited commentary. This observation isn’t merely about form; it’s a subtle reinforcement of neurotypical standards, where deviation is noted and, implicitly, corrected.

Spirituality and Neurodivergence

Interestingly, many neurodivergent individuals report heightened sensory experiences, deep empathy, and unique spiritual perceptions. These traits, rather than being anomalies, can be profound assets in spiritual practices. Historically, such sensitivities were revered, with neurodivergent individuals often holding roles as shamans or spiritual leaders in various cultures.

Moving Forward: Embracing Neurodiversity

It’s imperative to shift our perspective from viewing neurodivergence as a condition to be disclosed or managed, to recognizing it as a natural variation of human experience. Just as society has progressed in its understanding and acceptance of different sexual orientations, we must extend the same respect and inclusivity to neurodivergent individuals.

Creating environments that honor and accommodate neurological diversity benefits everyone. By challenging outdated norms and embracing a more inclusive approach, we pave the way for a society where all individuals can thrive without the burden of unnecessary disclosure.

⸻

Note: This article draws upon historical and contemporary sources to highlight the parallels between past and present challenges faced by marginalized communities. It advocates for a more inclusive and understanding society that respects and accommodates neurological diversity.